Sunday, March 22, 2020

English Literature In 16th Essays - The Canterbury Tales

English Literature In 16th Although the literature of England during the Middle Ages may hardly seem comparable to the more elegant literature present during the Renaissance, England=s early literature actually paved the way for the poems and plays of the 16th century. In this respect, English literature of the Renaissance may be seen as a refinement of its earlier works, helped in part by the collapse of the universal church and the rebirth of Greek and Roman ideas. Many of the things written about during this period-- the issues addressed in The Canterbury Tales for example-- were not entirely new subjects, but instead ones that been suppressed by the church or upper-class in previous works of literature. Finally, with the growing education of the middle and lower classes, greater diversity of style became apparent. In order to understand the differences and similarities of these two literary time periods, one must first understand the influences upon the Middel Ages from its predecessor. During the Middle Ages, some of the traditional Old English beliefs were kept, but with a few changes. The patriarchal system remained, although unlike the literature of the 8th and 9th century, women were now finding their place in many written works. For example, when Chaucer writes of The Wife of Bathe, he depicts a colorful character who would never have surfaced in Beowulf. Another change is found in the idea of the [emailprotected] During the Middle Ages, the hero has become less hardened; he has acquired values and morals. The idea of a chivalrous knight has taken the place of a unidimensional warrior who grunts and boasts and drags his knuckles as he walks. The Knight 2 most prolific change, however, was in the new presence of the Christian Church, which took the place of the Anglo-Saxon=s fatalistic culture and influenced almost all of the aspects of the society of the Middle Ages. The Renaissance, with its rebirth of art and science, brought about further change to the literature of England. Where the stories of knights and warriors fighting Grendels and dragons once dominated the literature, beautifully scripted sonnets and tales of romance now took the literary forefront. Take, for example, women=s roles in written works. Women carried very little importance in the literature of Beowulf=s time, but by the time Chaucer wrote The Canterbury Tales, female characters were more prevalent. Although the Wife of Bathe was a comical character, it is noteworthy that she is also a strong character-- stronger, even than some of Chaucer=s male characters: She was a worthy womman al hir live; Housbondes at chirch dore she had five, Withouten other compaignye in youthe-- But thereof needeth nought to speke as nouthe. (Chaucer 90) The Wife of Bathe is a Aremarkable culmination of many centuries of an antifeminism that was particularly nurtured by the medieval church (Abrams 117). Chaucer shows her as large, ugly, and strong-willed; this last notion was taken by critics of the day as a satirical idea in a satirical work, but now is seen more as an accurate assessment than an ironic one. With the removal of the medieval church, as one of the influences upon literature, women were given more substantial roles, and the suppressed idea of romantic love was allowed to come forward in the works of such Renaissance writers as Spenser and Shakespeare. Where Chaucer wrote of women such as Alisoun, the unfaithful miller=s wife, Spenser wrote Knight 3 of his woman: Her lips did smeel like gillyflowers, Her ruddy cheeks like unto roses red; Her snowy browes lyke budded bellamoures, Her lovely eyes like pinks but newly spred, Her goodly bosom lyke a strawberry bed, Her neck lyke to a bounch of cullambynes (417). Likewise, Shakespeare wrote in Sonnet 18, AShall I compare thee to a summer=s day? Thou art more lovely and more [emailprotected] (491). The fall of the Catholic church from dominance enabled sonnets and plays such as these to surface, and with the education of the middle class, the popularity of these kinds of writings was only increasing, while the popularity of morality plays and poems of the Middle Ages was rapidly decreasing. Poems of the 16th century were not epic verses filled with violence, such as Beuwulf, but instead, relatively brief, usually with the purpose of praising some aspect of love or nature. Another difference can be found in the idea of the literary [emailprotected] The change from Beowulf to the knight in Chaucer=s Tales is equalled only by the change from Chuacer=s knight to the tragic heroes of Shakespeare or Spenser=s

Friday, March 6, 2020

The Damnation of a Canyon Essays

The Damnation of a Canyon Essays The Damnation of a Canyon Paper The Damnation of a Canyon Paper The Colorado river, The Nile river, the Jang cà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½ tiang river. They have one incommon. Every of them is polluted and somehow destroyed by humans. The modern establishments of people have brought us a new possibilities how to treat with nature. As far as I am concerned, nowadays, it is a question of business. No matters whether it harms the environment or not. But who cares? Mr. Edward Abbey was looking for some objections in the environmental perspective in his article Damnation of a Canyon, first appeared in 1971 in Beyond the Wall: Essays from the outside, canyonlands did have a heart, a living heart, and that heart was Glen Canyon and the golden, flowing Colorado River.(Abbey, 2003) He concluded the nowadays conditions of canyonland country and the effects of industrialization of society in this beautiful and untouched environment. Abbey examines, that the Glen Canyon has not ever needed any change for better conditions. First, when he was a park ranger at the new Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, there were many animals, plants in symbiottical relationship. It was wilderness itself. Second, Abbey argues that the damaging of that region started with transformation of nature into a business profit ceremony. Finally, he speaks about the dam, which caused this horrible situation and he does not find any benefical point of this building. Abbey refers to the bad living conditions of animals as well, as we can see in disappereance of many of them by flooding the Glen Canyon. Although Edwardà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s analysis has a strong relevance, In my opinion, he underestimates the current situation in the Colorado river and he forgot to mention who caused those changes in the region of Glen Canyon. A responsibilty lies on every human being, not just people living in the region, but it is all about us.  Abbeyà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s decisive morality acitvated a serial of hypothesis about future and the heritage of Mother Earth; he pointed out how this area will be damaged soon, if all involved do not take some decision and sum up their priorities; posing a questions to those people would make some challenge and stop the industry to take profit from marvellous places in our World; he asserted many aspects in his explanation, but did he gave some sollution to the problem? Edward, speaking to all people, provides a deep insights into the topic of environmental pollution even though he underestimated the economical utilization of Lake Powel and the Dam. Many of Abbeyà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½s point are right and cannot be argued by any scientist and also he got my angle of vision. I completely agree that now the Lake Powel is not a true lake, but just a fake lake and a big reservoir. Overall the calmness and the wilderness has vanished from the nature. There is no doubt, that people should do something with it. The simple discussion on the issue is useless. It reminds me a one situation, when woman found a garbage on the floor and she started to report about it to men around her, instead of removing it by herself. In spite of fact, the status of the Dam is very bad, Abbey did not do anything for years to change it. He made some speech and summarized the weakest points of that huge construction, but did not look on the other side. Did he ask himself on the public opinion? Abbey offers alternatives like solar energy system and to destroy the dam like a feather. Apparently, he does not allude the price, of the building. The workers, who worked there for ours benefits. In addition, whole economy policy should be change at all. This exploration leads him into overgeneralization of the problem. Particularly, Abbey appealed on the destructive activity and ecological catastrophe for the region, however the construction of the Glen Canyon Dam did not caused anything. If he want to judge people who brought investments into the area, he should blame the society as well. Besides overgeneralizing, how long would the nature resists against the human ecological pressure? In fact, the comparison of former river canyon and nowadays reservoir is not suitable implying those informations he demonstrated. Relying on promises of people Abbey assumed to not being with opposition with natureAccording to his wishes, it is impossible to do something with it; neverthless he asserts about lazy americans and the possibilities of access, but it reveals into a mistake, which could offend many honest inhabitants of U. S. Furthermore, Edward encourages himself to be a protector of commonalty; being favoured in the eyes of people is in and it makes him famous. Greenpeace and another communities trying to call attention to globalization are useless too. I would like to cite the author who think the nature will defend itself and will safe her majesty: I say give a nature a little time. In five years, at most in ten, the sun and wind and storms will cleanse and sterilize the repellent mess. In conclusion, mr. Edward Abbey did a very good, when he started a discussion on this serious problem, perhaps this step will motivate others to make some important moves towards nature. The tendency of thinking of humans would be change, if they realise the true significance of our envirnment and climate conversion. I think Abbey did excellently. If this was the action of Marathon, I hope he will come to the finish as soon as possible.